Another crossover.
Jul. 16th, 2009 08:09 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
elwenOh noes, lawyers and accountants are using their powers for evil, with Tolkien and his heirs as the victims.
But who in the world uses "Lord" as a short name? Are we calling them "Harry" now, too?
I dunno, I think I'd rather see the estate get its royalties at the cost of The Hobbit being enjoined than see The Hobbit made while the studios are ripping the Tolkiens off. (Somewhat opposite my reaction to the Rowling case.)
But who in the world uses "Lord" as a short name? Are we calling them "Harry" now, too?
I dunno, I think I'd rather see the estate get its royalties at the cost of The Hobbit being enjoined than see The Hobbit made while the studios are ripping the Tolkiens off. (Somewhat opposite my reaction to the Rowling case.)
no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 02:17 pm (UTC)Also, when I read their headline "LoTR Lawsuit Threatens Hobbit Production" I was really really confused about why they thought hobbits were a manufactured good with production levels.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 11:40 pm (UTC)LOL. Hobbit production is down! Better stock up now!